An MCP Registry vs a Local-First MCP Workflow
Short answer: A registry is a cloud-centered discovery layer; a local-first workflow keeps the contract in your repo and generates the server on save. The first is about finding and
Read articleTopic
Comparison
Powerduck vs Smithery: Where Should You Host Your MCP Server?
Short answer: A registry is the right place to discover and connect to someone else's service; a generator is the right place to publish your own. If you
Read articleSelf-Hosted MCP vs a Smithery Gateway
Short answer: A gateway handles credentials, OAuth, and sessions for you and sits in the call path; a self-hosted server runs on your own infrastructure with no intermediary. Use a
Read articleGenerate an MCP Server from OpenAPI vs Pulling One from a Registry
Short answer: A registry supplies a server someone else authored; a generator compiles your contract into a server. For your own API, the generated server is correct by construction and
Read articleMCP Server OAuth: Smithery vs Powerduck
Short answer: A gateway's managed OAuth is the right tool for connecting agents to third-party services, because it centralizes client credentials and consent. A generated server focuses on
Read articleFree MCP Hosting Limits: Smithery vs Powerduck Hub
Short answer: Both platforms offer a free tier, but the limits are shaped differently. A registry's free tier is metered per call and limited in namespaces; a generated
Read articleHow to Publish an MCP Server Without a Registry
Short answer: You do not need a registry to expose your own API. Keep the spec in the repo, generate the server, run it over a local transport for development,
Read articleOpenAPI MCP Provenance and Why Skipped Tools Matter
Short answer: A generated server shows exactly which operation and schema produced each tool, and surfaces the operations it skipped because their metadata was incomplete. A catalog server is opaque:
Read articleCursor and Powerduck: Why They Are Better Together
Short answer: The two tools sit at different layers and compose cleanly. Cursor writes the code and drives the agent; Powerduck defines the contract, generates the typed tools and mock,
Read articleMigrating from Manual Cursor API Prompts to Spec-Driven Tools
Short answer: Stop paying an agent to re-derive the API from pasted notes. Put the OpenAPI file in the repo, generate the tools and mock from it, and let the
Read articleLocal-First API Mocking for Cursor Agents
Short answer: Give the agent a local mock generated from the spec, not a live backend. It is deterministic, contract-shaped, and returns the edge cases on demand, with no account
Read articleAPI Testing in Cursor vs a Contract-Verified Workflow
Short answer: An editor can write a test, but it cannot prove the response conforms to the API. A contract-verified workflow checks each response against the schema and flags the
Read article