API Testing in Cursor vs a Contract-Verified Workflow
Short answer: An editor can write a test, but it cannot prove the response conforms to the API. A contract-verified workflow checks each response against the schema and flags the
Read articleTopic
MCP & Coding
Why Cursor Hallucinates API Calls Without a Spec
Short answer: An agent hallucinates an API call because it is predicting the next token, not reading your server. Without a contract, it fills in the endpoint, parameters, and body
Read articleCursor MCP Config vs an OpenAPI-Generated MCP Server
Short answer: A hand-written MCP entry in Cursor's config is plumbing you maintain; a generated server is derived from the contract. Both expose tools to the agent, but
Read articleHow to Give Cursor Accurate API Tools with an MCP Server
Short answer: Generate an MCP server from your OpenAPI spec, run it locally, and add it to Cursor's MCP configuration. The agent then calls typed tools that trace
Read articlePowerduck vs Cursor: Do You Need an API Contract Tool Alongside Your AI Editor?
Short answer: If your agent is already writing good code but its API calls are wrong, the missing piece is not a better editor — it is a contract tool. Cursor
Read articlePowerduck vs Cursor: API Contract Tools for AI Coding
Quick answer: Cursor and Powerduck are not the same kind of tool, and treating them as rivals is the first mistake. Cursor is an AI code editor that consumes tools
Read article